Talk:Stephen Báthory/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague (talk · contribs) 15:44, 8 September 2013 (UTC) Stephen's legacy is no doubt neglected due to the actions of a certain relative. Review coming soon! QatarStarsLeague (talk) 15:44, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusion

This article passes, including the images. Excellent work! QatarStarsLeague (talk) 11:34, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re-opening

the Peace of Jam Zapolski on 15 January 158. - you missed a digit.

In 1584 Báthory allowed Zamoyski to execute Samuel Zborowski, - you might want to pull one of the ref closer into this statement.

he is a patron of the Batory Steelmill, - did you have a reference?
- All claims in this sentence are sourced to PSB as indicated, I just double checked.
9th Armored Cavalry Brigade - a link or a reference?
- Ditto (pl:9 Brygada Kawalerii Pancernej), no en wiki article yet
After the Second World War, in the communist People's Republic of Poland, he became more of a controversial figure, with historians more ready to question his internal politics and attachment to Hungary. - Need a reference.
- PSB page added.

That's my thoughts. Will read it through a second time later today. Ajh1492 (talk) 10:50, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Ajh1492: thanks, fixed done. @User:Khazar2: would you consider doing a language copyedit, as neither me nor Ajh are English native speakers? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:31, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can do that later today. If you don't mind my asking a favor in exchange, would you be willing to comment at Wikipedia:Peer_review/United_Nations/archive3? I'd be interested in your thoughts as to whether that one's ready for GA, or if not, what more should be done. Cheers, -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:21, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I think this is close to ready to pass on the "clear and correct" part of criterion 1a. I do have a few questions still below that you could clarify, and I can't promise I caught everything, but it's just about there. Thanks for another good contribution, Piotrus, and particularly thanks for sending this back for a double-check. -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:29, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"refused to recognize him " -- Bathory or Maximillian? I'm assuming Bathory, but Maxmillian was the last one named. -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
All the captions say "Batory" rather than "Báthory"; I assume these are legitimate variants, but this should probably be made consistent.
"The Emperor's brother Archduke Maximilian" -- the Emperor Maximilian had a brother also named Maximilian? Or are we talking about a different emperor now (Rudolf II, Holy Roman Emperor)?
"Through some historians like Tadeusz Korzon, Joachim Lelewel and Jędrzej Moraczewski remained more reserved" -- I'm not sure what you mean here-- should the "through" be "though"?

Thanks, all fixed. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:35, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like the review is legitimately finished. Congratulations! Ajh1492 (talk) 17:21, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]